Wednesday, February 13, 2019

I Celebrate My Story

In 1855, Walt Whitman published a book of poetry, Leaves of Grass. Only, at the time, nobody knew it was published by Walt Whitman. There was no name. Not on the cover. Or on the spine. Or even inside the book. There was, however,  a picture of a man, standing informally with a hand on his hip and the other in his pocket, with his collar unbuttoned and his hat resting at bit of an angle on his head:

To me the picture says, "Here I am. Accept me or not. It makes no difference. I am who I am." Of course, I know Whitman styled the image to achieve this response, so, in a way, it is an act. At the same time, I always felt that there was an authenticity to it. A genuineness. Even if there was no name attached. I wonder if people in 1855 felt the same way? 

Turning the page, a reader in 1855 would have seen these lines: "I celebrate myself,/And what I assume you shall assume,/For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you." Interesting. A book with no name, a picture with no given identity, and then opening lines that emphasize "I." 

Perhaps the idea is to get the reader to identify as "I" while reading, to speak the "I" and, thus, become it. Or maybe the idea is to focus on our commonalities. Yes, we all have different names. But, ultimately we share a common humanity. We are different, but we are one. Or maybe the idea is to be proud of who you are, and to own your unique identity because it matters. Or maybe it is all of these together and more.

And now, I've crafted a blackout poem in response:

A little song
I know
I own
--
my story

I like it--the way "know" and "own" play off of each other, the way it downplays life with the phrase "my story," which is actually anything but small big, and the way it picks up on Whitman's use of singing as a metaphor for living. 

It feels good to respond in this way. In fact, maybe it is unique in all of the responses ever written to Whitman's words. There's a thought.

Thursday, September 27, 2018

3 for 5: gods & culture

We are finishing our fifth week of school, which means it is a good time to take a breath and reconsider some of the stuff that has come my way. While I share similar material with students from year to year, there's always something new, whether generated by them or me. Here are three statements that had me wondering over the last month.

"We are gods in ruins"--R.W. Emerson

This is a statement I had not heard before. It came up in a video I showed about Emerson from the YouTube Channel, "The School of Life." I paused on it in class and asked students to contemplate its meaning. And it has stuck with me since. For Emerson, it had to do with his pantheistic worldview: we all have a "divine spark." However, I think about it in less of a religious sense and more as a metaphor. I think about "god" as a being with the potential to be a powerful creator. Yet, we constantly undermine our potential by not taking creative risks or being honest with who we are and what we believe.


"Kneading Culture as Bread"--Kevin Coval

This line is from Coval's poem about Jane Addams, called "How Down She Be." I used it in class last year. It does a fantastic job illustrating how a poem can shine a light on significant people and events. And it illustrates the way a poet can use a minimum of words to coney layers of meaning. In this case, we understand that through her work with Hull House, Addams nurtured culture for people who typically did not have access to it. The idea of "kneading" is very physical. It is a hands-on approach. This was Jane Addams. At the same time, "kneading" is a homophone with "needing," which extends the metaphor from a person nurturing culture to the necessity for culture in this area. It is a great example of an artist making the most of language. And I imagine him having fun while doing it.

"The most radical division is that which splits humanity into two classes: those who make great demands on themselves and those who demand nothing special."--Jose Ortega y Gasset


This statement was quoted by a different writer, Louis Beres, in his essay, "The few, the proud, the individuals." Talk about being counter-cultural. I feel like our culture stresses superficiality, finding the easiest ways to get things done, and being a consumer above all else. These have nothing to do with embracing challenges or accepting that struggle is a part of life. When I read these words, I know which "class" I want to belong to. I know which group offers something of value. I know which side will lead me to a more fulfilling life. Perhaps this is one that I need to write on walls and windows and sidewalks. This is one to remember.


As I look back at these statements, I think about what I'll encounter in the coming weeks. I wonder what ideas I have within me and if I will have the courage to share them, to make them known. In the meantime, I will continue to be open. I can at least demand that from myself.

Monday, September 3, 2018

Filling in the blank canvas

I have always been fascinated by artists. They start with a blank page, a blank canvas, a collection of chords. Then, through sweat, determination, and vision, something incredible happens. Worlds are born, songs are crafted, paintings are created. Since high school, I wanted a part in this. But how? As a 36 year old, I decided one possible avenue. With the help of some talented friends, I picked up the guitar and have been playing it ever since.



My plan now? To keep learning, to keep playing. Maybe write some songs, even if they are just for me.

Thanks for reading.

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Nothing is Truth is Nothing

Throughout his novel The Things They Carried, Tim O'Brien plays with our ideas about truth. Of course, he says he is not playing at but trying to expose the reader to the life he lived for a year while a foot soldier in Vietnam. It was a year of ambiguity, confusion, and lack of truth. A year when "the old rules were no longer binding." While O'Brien illustrates the number of burdens soldiers had to carry, among the heaviest was the feeling that truth no longer existed except in on way: they would never be at a loss for violence. And people would not understand.    
   1.
We use stories to make sense of our world and to share that understanding with others.  They are the signal within the noise.
                 
  2.
Can I ever really understand somebody else's story?  Or my own?

  3.
[The] intention was to capture the experience of combat, boredom and fear through the eyes of the soldiers themselves. Their experiences are important to understand, regardless of one's political beliefs. Beliefs are a way to avoid looking at reality. This is reality.

  4.
Those who knew
what was going on here
must give way to
those who know little.
And less than little.
And finally as little as nothing.

  5. 












  

   6.
If you don't care for obscenity you don't care for the truth.

   7.
What's obscene is ideology--the hardening of opinion into stubborn belief.  With ideology, one no longer has to think. With ideologies, stories become brittle.

   8.
It has become a kind of rule that neatness counts in narrative: don't leave the audience wondering.

   9. 


   10.
Once I read an essay by Jacques Barzun.  He said no truths last forever.  Humans are truth-seekers, but they are even better truth-inventors.

   11. 
The letters weighed 10 ounces.  They were signed Love, Martha, but Lt. Cross understood that Love was only a way of signing and did not mean what he sometimes pretended it meant.

   12.
I remember Mitchell Sanders smiling as he told me that story.  Most of it he made up, I'm sure, but even so it gave me a quick truth-goose.  Because it's all relative.

   13.
Almost everything is invented.

   14. 
Don't ask me nothin' about nothin'
I just might tell you the truth. 

   15.

                   Bob Dylan Wrote Propaganda Songs
   16.
There it absolutely and positively and f***ing well is.
. . .
1  Sebastian Junger and Tim Hetherington,  comments on Restrepo
2  Frank Rose,  The Art of Immersion 
4  Wislawa Szymborska,  "The End and The Beginning"
5  Nick Ut
6  Tim O'Brien,  The Things They Carried
8  Robert Fulford,  The Triumph of Narrative
11-13 Tim O'Brien
14 Bob Dylan, "Tom Thumb's Blues"
15 The Minutemen, "Bob Dylan Wrote Propaganda Songs"
16 Tim O'Brien 

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

In The Things They Carried, Tim O'Brien spends a chapter discussing the finer points of telling a "true war story."


Made with Padlet

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Bill Russell: Courage at Center

As an English teacher, I spend a portion of every year discussing American ideals, like self-reliance, freedom, and individuality. I enjoy hearing what students have to say about Ralph Waldo Emerson’s directions to “detect and watch that gleam of light that flashes within” ("Self-Reliance") and Walt Whitman’s belief that we all can “contribute a verse” (“O Me O Life"). Then again, it goes beyond simply introducing these ideas to others. Each year, these writers remind me of how I want to live. I want to trust my ideas. I want to be open to experiences. I want to share what I have learned with others.

In class, I have used a variety of people to model these ideals: Colin Kaepernick, Edward Snowden, Jane Addams. Whether a person agrees or disagrees with their actions, each of these individuals followed their own thinking. Each of these individuals refused to conform. Each of these individuals exercised courage.

Courage. 

It is impossible to downplay the importance of this trait for those who attempt to live self-reliant lives. Undoubtedly, Kaepernick, Snowden, and Addams show just how much others, including the State, will denounce and even attempt to destroy you for actions that challenge conventional thinking. Without courage, none of these people would have persisted.

And I found one more individual who personifies courage: Bill Russell. I have known of Bill Russell, the great Celtic center, for a long time. I heard his name mentioned by older relatives who watched him play in the NBA's earlier days. I saw his appearance in a handful of commercials, always playing the older spokesman. And I watched the news when Obama awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom. But I was unaware of his story. I was unaware of the extent of his accomplishments. I was unaware of his dedication to our American ideals--freedom, opportunity, justice for all--especially during a tumultuous time when speaking out meant endangering his career. And life. I was just unaware. 

Now that I am aware, I have written a poem in an attempt to capture what makes him a courageous American, worthy of being called "hero."


Bill Russell transcends basketball. That's the way he saw himself and that is the way we should see him. In 2013, Russell gave a speech at the Lincoln Memorial, the great president with whom he shares a birthday. According to reporter Bill Littlefield, "he spoke of himself, not as a basketball player, but as a man who played basketball." Throughout his life, Bill Russell refused to allow others to define him in any way except based on his merits. He saw himself as the embodiment of the American Dream-rising up from poverty, instilled with the attitude to work hard and persist. He has set an example for all Americans to follow.


Tuesday, October 31, 2017

This Moment Is Mine

If there is an ultimate take-away I try to impart to Humanities students, it is this: be a creator. Make creating a daily practice. The tools do not matter. The subject does not matter, nor the product itself. The act itself is what matters, because to be a creator is to be a participant in your world. To be creator is to be an observer of your world. To be creator is to be a wanderer of your world. A wonder-er of your world.

Or, as the street artist Swoon says:

There’s that feeling you get when you see something that you don’t understand the origin of: wonderment. It brings about a kind of innocence, and I love that. I love to witness it. I love to be a part of making those moments happen.

Which brings me to a problem I encountered about six years ago. I did not create much. I messed around with some visual projects once in awhile. But I did not have a routine or a practice that I returned to regularly. This produced an overwhelming dissonance. I felt fraudulent. Here I was, cajoling and imploring students to create, to take chances, to challenge themselves.

What about me?

My first outlet was learning guitar. Music has always been a big part of my life, and it depressed me that I did not play an instrument. So this seemed like a natural starting point. It was incredible. For all of the frustration — and, oh my, was there frustration — I loved the growing number of chords I mastered, the growing catalogue of songs I could play.

Now, I value the way playing guitar helps me to hear music differently, to appreciate it more deeply. As much as I was in awe of songwriters like Elliott Smith and Steve Earle before learning guitar, being able to play made me aware of their songcraft, the way they connect chords in surprising and resonant ways. Additionally, guitar offers me an out. If I play for 45 minutes, it is 45 minutes without a screen. It is 45 minutes during which my focus narrows even while my mind roams.

I wanted other outlets, though. In particular, I wanted something visual. Ultimately, I decided on woodblock printing. I have always been attracted to its aesthetics—the use of negative space, the simultaneous starkness and richness of black ink, the bold lines, the simplicity of the materials that belies a complexity of technique.

Like this print.
“Cacophonous Voices,” Alex Gillies
The artist conveys a dynamic story with wood, ink, and paper. I find myself a bit lost in the details, considering, for example, the way he renders the hair. Or the bracelet on the left wrist. Or the creases on the jacket. When I look at this piece, I think, “I want to do this.”

I want to do this. How many of these moments do I have when looking at art, listening to music, watching a film? I want to do this.

Often, I follow that declarative statement with the question “can I do this?” And, way too often, I have answered that question by saying, “no, of course I can’t.” I think many people have the same looping inner monologue. Where does this “no” come from? For me, it arises from a sense that what I might create would pale in comparison to what I have seen others do, as if somehow my work will be judged and mocked by the world. I know. This is ludicrous. First of all, I can share or not share as I see fit. Second, even if I choose to share, very few people will see my work. Third, getting eyes on my work is not even the point. The point is to feel engaged. To do something with intention and attention. To surprise myself by what I might be capable of. To find enjoyment and to seek a vision.

To turn the “no, of course I can’t” into “yes, I can. And will.”

So that is what I have done over the last two years. With the help of a great colleague, friend, and mentor, I have started to make art. To make prints. The work is slow and challenging. There have been some successes, but far more blunders, frustrations, and failures. However, when I turn the kitchen island into the production studio, when I roll the ink on to the carved block, place the paper down, rub the baren across its surface, and peel it back. . .


It is for me.